Head to head
E8 Markets vs FTMO
Weekly 100%-split payouts against the industry benchmark.
| Metric | E8 Markets | FTMO |
|---|---|---|
| Trust score | 79/100 | 94/100 |
| Profit split | 100% | 90% |
| Entry price | $68 | $345 |
| Evaluation | 1-step | 2-step |
| Drawdown | Static | Static |
| First payout | 7 days | 14 days |
| Max allocation | $400k | $400k |
| Founded | 2021 | 2015 |
Our verdict
E8 Markets offers a one-step evaluation, static drawdown, no consistency rule and payouts every 7 days at up to 100%. FTMO costs more and takes two steps, but has the deepest payout history in forex.
Drawdown mechanics: the rule that decides the account
E8 Markets runs static drawdown — measured from the starting balance and never trailing your equity — once you are in profit the whole buffer stays yours. FTMO runs static drawdown — measured from the starting balance and never trailing your equity — once you are in profit the whole buffer stays yours. This single difference decides more accounts than the profit split does, because it changes how much of an open winner you are allowed to give back before the account closes.
Because both firms use the same model, the deciding factor moves to the daily and consistency layer: E8 Markets applies none, FTMO applies none on the evaluation. Where the drawdown mechanics match, the consistency rule is what usually gates the first withdrawal.
12-month cost of ownership
Sticker price is the wrong comparison unit, because almost nobody passes on the first attempt. Modelled over a realistic first year — E8 Markets at $68 entry: $68 for one pass, $136 at two attempts, $204 at three; FTMO at $345 entry: $345 for one pass, $690 at two attempts, $1,035 at three — E8 Markets is roughly 5.1x cheaper per attempt than FTMO. Over three attempts that gap compounds to $831.
Two adjustments matter on top of that. Futures-style firms typically bill the funded account monthly or charge an activation fee, so a year of ownership adds cost after you pass, while most forex-style evaluation firms charge once and several refund the fee with the first payout. And allocation is not equal: E8 Markets scales to $400k against $400k at FTMO, so cost per dollar of eventual buying power can invert the ranking above.
Net of all that, the practical read is simple. If you are still proving a strategy, the cheaper per-attempt firm is the rational place to burn attempts. If you are already consistent, pay up for the firm whose payout record and allocation ceiling you actually intend to use.
Payout speed and payout evidence
E8 Markets allows a first withdrawal around day 7 and pays every 7 days; FTMO allows it around day 14 and pays bi-weekly on demand. E8 Markets gets money moving 7 days sooner than FTMO, which matters most on a first funded account where you want proof of the payout rail before you size up.
Speed without evidence is worthless, so weigh it against how well each firm's payouts are documented: E8 Markets scores 80/100 on our payout-evidence metric and FTMO scores 96/100, feeding trust scores of 79 and 94 respectively. The gap between a fast-paying firm with thin public evidence and a slower one with years of verifiable payout history is the single largest risk you carry in this category.
Also check the withdrawal gate, not just the calendar. E8 Markets applies none and FTMO applies none on the evaluation — a consistency cap can hold back a large winning week regardless of how often the firm says it pays.
Rulebooks side by side
E8 Markets
- Static drawdown across models. No trailing equity mechanic; loss limits reference the starting balance.
- No consistency rule. Weekly withdrawals are not gated on daily profit distribution, which pairs well with the seven-day cycle.
- Model-specific targets. Profit targets, minimum days and leverage differ meaningfully between archetypes. The comparison that matters is between E8's own models, not just E8 versus another firm.
FTMO
- Static maximum loss. Your drawdown is measured from the initial balance and does not trail your equity high. Once you are up 8% on a 10% buffer, that entire cushion stays yours — the opposite of the trailing models used across futures.
- 5% daily loss limit. Calculated on the higher of balance or equity at the daily reset, and it includes floating losses on open positions. Most FTMO failures are daily-limit breaches from holding a loser through a news print, not blown maximum drawdown.
- News and weekend rules. The standard FTMO Challenge allows news trading and weekend holding; the Swing account exists specifically to remove restrictions on both. Check which product you bought before an NFP release.