PropFirmBeacon

Head to head

Funding Ticks vs My Funded Futures

The two fastest first payouts in futures: five winning days each.

MetricFunding TicksMy Funded Futures
Trust score70/10084/100
Profit split90%90%
Entry price$45$77
Evaluation1-step1-step
DrawdownEnd-of-day trailingEnd-of-day trailing
First payout5 days5 days
Max allocation$300k$150k
Founded20242023

Our verdict

Both allow a first payout after five winning days on end-of-day trailing drawdown. Funding Ticks is cheaper to start but caps any single day at 30% of profit; My Funded Futures is more established with no activation fee (trust 84 vs 70).

Drawdown mechanics: the rule that decides the account

Funding Ticks runs end-of-day trailing drawdown — trailing only on the end-of-day close, which lets you give back intraday profit without tightening the buffer until the session settles. My Funded Futures runs end-of-day trailing drawdown — trailing only on the end-of-day close, which lets you give back intraday profit without tightening the buffer until the session settles. This single difference decides more accounts than the profit split does, because it changes how much of an open winner you are allowed to give back before the account closes.

Because both firms use the same model, the deciding factor moves to the daily and consistency layer: Funding Ticks applies no single day > 30% of net profit, My Funded Futures applies progressive payout caps until the account matures. Where the drawdown mechanics match, the consistency rule is what usually gates the first withdrawal.

12-month cost of ownership

Sticker price is the wrong comparison unit, because almost nobody passes on the first attempt. Modelled over a realistic first year — Funding Ticks at $45 entry: $45 for one pass, $90 at two attempts, $135 at three; My Funded Futures at $77 entry: $77 for one pass, $154 at two attempts, $231 at three — Funding Ticks is roughly 1.7x cheaper per attempt than My Funded Futures. Over three attempts that gap compounds to $96.

Two adjustments matter on top of that. Futures-style firms typically bill the funded account monthly or charge an activation fee, so a year of ownership adds cost after you pass, while most forex-style evaluation firms charge once and several refund the fee with the first payout. And allocation is not equal: Funding Ticks scales to $300k against $150k at My Funded Futures, so cost per dollar of eventual buying power can invert the ranking above.

Net of all that, the practical read is simple. If you are still proving a strategy, the cheaper per-attempt firm is the rational place to burn attempts. If you are already consistent, pay up for the firm whose payout record and allocation ceiling you actually intend to use.

Payout speed and payout evidence

Funding Ticks allows a first withdrawal around day 5 and pays on-demand after 5 winning days; My Funded Futures allows it around day 5 and pays every 5 winning days (core/scale). Timing is effectively identical, so the deciding factor is evidence quality rather than speed.

Speed without evidence is worthless, so weigh it against how well each firm's payouts are documented: Funding Ticks scores 71/100 on our payout-evidence metric and My Funded Futures scores 86/100, feeding trust scores of 70 and 84 respectively. The gap between a fast-paying firm with thin public evidence and a slower one with years of verifiable payout history is the single largest risk you carry in this category.

Also check the withdrawal gate, not just the calendar. Funding Ticks applies no single day > 30% of net profit and My Funded Futures applies progressive payout caps until the account matures — a consistency cap can hold back a large winning week regardless of how often the firm says it pays.

Rulebooks side by side

Funding Ticks

  • End-of-day trailing drawdown. The loss floor follows your closing balance each session and stops trailing once it reaches the starting balance. It does not follow intraday equity peaks, so an unrealised spike does not permanently raise your floor — an important difference from Apex's intraday model.
  • 30% consistency rule. No single trading day may account for more than 30% of the net profit in a payout cycle. This is the strictest consistency clause among the cheap futures firms and it is enforced at withdrawal, not at pass. A trader who makes most of a month's profit on one CPI print will be asked to trade more days before the payout clears.
  • No daily loss limit. There is no separate daily stop-out on the standard evaluation; the trailing floor is the only hard limit. That gives more room to recover a bad open, but it also removes the guardrail that stops a revenge-trading session from ending the account.
  • Five winning days before withdrawal. A winning day is any session that closes green by a minimum amount set by the firm. Five of them unlock the first request; after that withdrawals are on demand within the consistency cap.

My Funded Futures

  • End-of-day trailing drawdown on the main plans. The drawdown updates on closed end-of-day balances rather than intraday equity peaks, which is materially more survivable than Apex's model.
  • Progressive payout caps. Early withdrawals are capped in size until the account matures. You can get paid quickly, but not unlimited amounts immediately — plan your first three payouts around the caps.
  • No activation fee. Funded accounts do not carry a separate monthly activation charge on the main plans, unlike several futures competitors.

Choose Funding Ticks if

You want the lower entry price and accept a 30% consistency cap.

Choose My Funded Futures if

You want the more established firm with no activation fee.