How to pass the Funding Ticks challenge

The maths you are actually up against

Every evaluation reduces to one ratio: how much you must make divided by how much you may lose. On Funding Ticks's 50k account that is $3k against $2k, a ratio of 1.5:1. Anything above 1.5:1 means you cannot pass by grinding small edges through a normal drawdown — you either run a genuinely positive expectancy or you get lucky, and the fee is priced on the assumption that most people are doing the second one.

The drawdown model changes the same numbers materially. Funding Ticks trails the drawdown on end-of-day balance, not intraday equity. Open profit does not drag the loss line up mid-session, so an intraday spike followed by a giveback does not kill you — but every closed profitable day permanently raises the line you must stay above the next morning.

Position size accordingly. At 0.5% of account per trade — $250 — you survive 8 consecutive full losers. A trader with a 45% win rate hits a 6-loss streak roughly once every 60 trades, so anything much above 1% risk on this structure is not aggression, it is a mathematical guarantee of eventual failure across enough attempts.

• Profit target: 6% = $3k on 50k
• Total loss buffer: 4% = $2k (End-of-day trailing)
• Suggested risk per trade: 0.5% = $250 — survives 8 losses in a row
• Net 2R winners required: about 6
• Consistency constraint: No single day > 30% of net profit
• Deadline: No deadline on the evaluation.

A pacing plan that fits Funding Ticks's rules

Because Funding Ticks imposes no calendar deadline, the correct pace is the slowest one you can tolerate. Traders fail unlimited-time evaluations at the same rate as timed ones, purely because they behave as if the clock exists. Set your own soft target of 18 trading days and accept flat weeks; a 0% week costs you nothing here and a -3% week costs you 33% of your usable risk.

Funding Ticks enforces no single day > 30% of net profit. That flips the strategy: your best day must stay small relative to the total, so a large early win actually forces you to keep trading to dilute it. Work out the required total before you take a big day — on a $3k target, a day worth more than the allowed share means you cannot withdraw until the account grows past it.

Day one after funding is the part almost every guide skips. The funded account is where the money is, and it is also where the drawdown rules bite hardest, because the buffer is usually the same size while your incentive to size up is far larger. Trade the first funded cycle at half the size you used in the evaluation, get to the first payout at around day 5, withdraw, and only then scale. A withdrawn payout is yours; an unpaid balance is a claim on a company.

• Weeks 1–2: fixed $250 risk, one setup only, no size changes
• Mid-evaluation: if you are down more than a third of the buffer, cut risk in half rather than pressing
• Final stretch: once you are within $600 of target, halve size again — most blow-ups happen inside the last 20% of the target
• Funded stage: half size until the first payout clears around day 5
• Payout cadence afterwards: On-demand after 5 winning days

The rules that actually fail Funding Ticks accounts

Most failed evaluations are not blown accounts — they are breaches. A breach means you were profitable and still lost the account, which is the most expensive way to fail. These are the Funding Ticks clauses that produce them, taken from the current rulebook.

News trading is allowed (No news restriction.) Expert advisors are conditionally allowed (Semi-automation allowed.) Weekend holding is not permitted (Flat before the weekend.)

The subtler failure is the prohibited-strategy clause every firm carries: tick scalping, latency arbitrage, hedged accounts across firms and copy-traded signals shared by many users. You will not get a warning for these; the account is closed and the profit is voided after the fact, usually at the payout review. If your edge depends on holding for under a minute or on running the same signal on several firms at once, verify it in writing with support before you pay.

• News: allowed — No news restriction.
• EAs / algos: conditionally allowed — Semi-automation allowed.
• Weekend holding: not permitted — Flat before the weekend.
• Overnight: not permitted — Intraday only.
• Copy trading: allowed — Multi-account copying supported.
• Consistency: 30% max single-day share of net profit at payout.

Which Funding Ticks account size to attempt

Buy the smallest size whose dollar buffer survives your normal losing streak, not the biggest one you can afford. On the ladder Funding Ticks sells, that usually means the 25k or the tier above it: at $30 the cost of a second attempt is small enough that you can treat attempt one as tuition instead of as an all-or-nothing bet.

Run the arithmetic in your own currency and instrument before you pay. A 50k account with a $2k buffer supports roughly 5 micro futures contracts at a 10-point stop, or about 0.25 standard lots at a 20-pip stop. If that size is below what your strategy needs to be worth trading, the account is too small for you and no amount of discipline fixes it.

Reset pricing matters as much as the entry fee. Recurring evaluation discount with code BEACON Work out the total cost of three attempts, because that is the realistic budget at a ~18% modelled pass rate — one attempt is a lottery ticket, three is a plan.

• 25k — $30: target $1.5k, buffer $1k
• 50k — $45: target $3k, buffer $2k
• 100k — $65: target $6k, buffer $4k
• 150k — $80: target $9k, buffer $6k

What separates the traders who pass

No firm in this industry publishes audited pass-rate data, ours included — the ~18% figure is modelled from the evaluation structure (1 phase, end-of-day trailing, no single day > 30% of net profit) and should be read as directional. What is consistent across every dataset we can see is the shape of the failures: oversizing after a loss, trading a setup outside the tested plan, and breaching a rule the trader never read.

The traders who clear Funding Ticks tend to do four unremarkable things. They trade one instrument they already know. They fix risk in dollars, not in "feel". They stop for the day after two losses. And they read the payout rules before the trading rules, because the payout clause — no single day > 30% of net profit, on-demand after 5 winning days — is what determines whether passing turns into money.

Funding Ticks launched in 2024 into the most crowded corner of the industry — cheap CME futures evaluations sold on a one-step model — and chose speed of payment as its differentiator. Where Topstep gates the first withdrawal behind a funded-account ruleset and Apex behind a payout schedule, Funding Ticks advertises an on-demand withdrawal once you have five winning days on the funded account, which in practice means a first payout inside a week for a trader who is actually profitable.

• One instrument, one session, one setup for the whole evaluation
• Risk fixed at $250 regardless of conviction
• Hard stop for the day after two losers or -1% on the account
• Read the payout clause before the trading rules
• Withdraw the first payout in full at around day 5, then scale

FAQ